Do native apps perform better than cross-platform apps?

Overall, yes, native apps typically provide marginally better performance since they execute directly on the platform, bypassing any additional layer. Nevertheless, contemporary cross-platform frameworks such as Flutter have significantly narrowed this gap, and for most app categories, the performance disparity is imperceptible to end users.

Which is more expensive, native or cross-platform app development?

Because native app development necessitates creating and maintaining two distinct codebases—one for iOS and one for Android—it is usually more costly. Since a single codebase supports both platforms, cross-platform development can save expenditures by 30 to 40%.

Can cross-platform apps access all native device features?

Through plugins and APIs, cross-platform frameworks can access the majority of native device functions, such as Bluetooth, GPS, camera, and push notifications. However, compared to native development, access to cutting-edge hardware features could be delayed.

Native vs cross-platform: which is better for a startup?

For startups, the cross-platform approach seems the way to go. The benefit is that you are able to develop your product quickly and cost-effectively, using just one development team for both iOS and Android. In case you have a product with some validated and scaling features, then native development could be considered.

Are cross-platform apps suitable for startups?

For companies with a small development budget who wish to swiftly launch on iOS and Android, cross-platform development may be an affordable choice.

Which is easier to maintain, native or cross-platform apps?

Cross-platform apps are usually easier to maintain since a lot of the codebase is common between platforms. This reduces the amount of effort to do updates and problem repairs.

Native vs Cross-Platform App Development in 2026